Manticore M9 coil compared to Deus 2 9” coil Small Spanish bit on edge
-
Tnsharpshooter
- Posts: 360
- Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2024 2:06 am
-
Tnsharpshooter
- Posts: 360
- Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2024 2:06 am
Re: Manticore M9 coil compared to Deus 2 9” coil Small Spanish bit on edge
Good video David,, Deus2 can be a bit shallower at reactivity 3..at 2.5..it is more optimal when you are looking for deeper targets..especially when you are using audio pitch...which weakens strongly with the depth of the target...it all depends on the size of the target and its depth...it is often better to use multitones/listen to the faint, soft sound of a mosquito/.,or 2 tones...if you are looking for deep targets..
If you also include the iron factor in the test, the situation becomes even more complicated..
Audio pitch is more effective in shallow and medium-deep unmasking...
Pitch 2 in the test can be seen to thin and shorten the total detected target signal..but at the same time it amplifies the shortened signal...sometimes it is better..but it can be seen that with a less smooth signal it can be lost altogether.
If you also include the iron factor in the test, the situation becomes even more complicated..
Audio pitch is more effective in shallow and medium-deep unmasking...
Pitch 2 in the test can be seen to thin and shorten the total detected target signal..but at the same time it amplifies the shortened signal...sometimes it is better..but it can be seen that with a less smooth signal it can be lost altogether.
-
Tnsharpshooter
- Posts: 360
- Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2024 2:06 am
Re: Manticore M9 coil compared to Deus 2 9” coil Small Spanish bit on edge
Correct. Pitch 2 can be better. It can be “worse” meaning audio behavior user may suspect ferrous false due to short “blutiness” of signal -Not smooth sounding like more textbook signal generally.EL NINO wrote: ↑Sun Jan 11, 2026 12:31 pm Good video David,, Deus2 can be a bit shallower at reactivity 3..at 2.5..it is more optimal when you are looking for deeper targets..especially when you are using audio pitch...which weakens strongly with the depth of the target...it all depends on the size of the target and its depth...it is often better to use multitones/listen to the faint, soft sound of a mosquito/.,or 2 tones...if you are looking for deep targets..
If you also include the iron factor in the test, the situation becomes even more complicated..
Audio pitch is more effective in shallow and medium-deep unmasking...
Pitch 2 in the test can be seen to thin and shorten the total detected target signal..but at the same time it amplifies the shortened signal...sometimes it is better..but it can be seen that with a less smooth signal it can be lost altogether.