Page 1 of 1
Detector Manufacturers should consider this with future models some at least
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2025 5:01 pm
by Tnsharpshooter
Re: Detector Manufacturers should consider this with future models some at least
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2025 8:56 pm
by NASA-Tom
Multi-freq units....... regardless of brand........ will express this.
This scenario....holds true.....for several examples; yet,
there are many examples whereby.....this does not hold true.
Your 'yesterday' video kinda/sorta expresses the latter. The Nickel never waivered. . . . but the zinc/potmetal target......expressed just like the gold ring video...of today.
BUT......... (((all is not lost!!!))).
Re: Detector Manufacturers should consider this with future models some at least
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2025 10:20 pm
by Tnsharpshooter
NASA-Tom wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 8:56 pm
Multi-freq units....... regardless of brand........ will express this.
This scenario....holds true.....for several examples; yet,
there are many examples whereby.....this does not hold true.
Your 'yesterday' video kinda/sorta expresses the latter. The Nickel never waivered. . . . but the zinc/potmetal target......expressed just like the gold ring video...of today.
BUT......... (((all is not lost!!!))).
Not Quite.
Don’t think one will see a 15 point ID change on a gold ring - this is what happened on pot metal junker.
As freq went up ID went down- On the junker (pot metal).
On the gold rings I have as frequency goes up ID goes up.
This using Deus 2 hf 2 coil. Comparing 29 kHz MF band to 89 KHz MF band.