Detector Manufacturers should consider this with future models some at least
-
Tnsharpshooter
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2024 2:06 am
Re: Detector Manufacturers should consider this with future models some at least
Multi-freq units....... regardless of brand........ will express this.
This scenario....holds true.....for several examples; yet,
there are many examples whereby.....this does not hold true.
Your 'yesterday' video kinda/sorta expresses the latter. The Nickel never waivered. . . . but the zinc/potmetal target......expressed just like the gold ring video...of today.
BUT......... (((all is not lost!!!))).
This scenario....holds true.....for several examples; yet,
there are many examples whereby.....this does not hold true.
Your 'yesterday' video kinda/sorta expresses the latter. The Nickel never waivered. . . . but the zinc/potmetal target......expressed just like the gold ring video...of today.
BUT......... (((all is not lost!!!))).
-
Tnsharpshooter
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2024 2:06 am
Re: Detector Manufacturers should consider this with future models some at least
Not Quite.NASA-Tom wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 8:56 pm Multi-freq units....... regardless of brand........ will express this.
This scenario....holds true.....for several examples; yet,
there are many examples whereby.....this does not hold true.
Your 'yesterday' video kinda/sorta expresses the latter. The Nickel never waivered. . . . but the zinc/potmetal target......expressed just like the gold ring video...of today.
BUT......... (((all is not lost!!!))).
Don’t think one will see a 15 point ID change on a gold ring - this is what happened on pot metal junker.
As freq went up ID went down- On the junker (pot metal).
On the gold rings I have as frequency goes up ID goes up.
This using Deus 2 hf 2 coil. Comparing 29 kHz MF band to 89 KHz MF band.