NASA-Tom wrote: ↑Wed Aug 13, 2025 8:39 pm
Gotcha. Well understood!
Here's some weird numbers for you:
Only about 2% of users use any of the custom programs! (((Making this revision NOT worthwhile))).
Generates about 35% better Marketing pitch......making more sales. (((Making this revision worthwhile!!)))
 
I just try to suggest things that make detectors more user friendly.
I’ll bring this up here.
Again I don’t know if this is possible.  Would be nice.
Question for you, Tom?
What period in seconds (or cycles of channels) defines a good long press noise cancel with Manticore?  For emi mitigation.
Whatever the answer is.
It would be nice if a long press noise cancel option was available for selecting.
Meaning if selected a user could just press and release and long press duration fixed duration time wise noise cancel would take place.
I am editing here to add- Minelab could offer 1, 2 or 3 timeframe options (or cycles) for long press noise cancel.
If a user didn’t have this option selected and wanted to do an even longer duration noise cancel they could.
If option not selected Manticore would behave like it does now with touching noise cancel button and releasing quick.
Just a thought.  No more for the most part having to hold a button.  Just engage button and release and let the detector do its thing while user holds coil still.  Hmm
Again if this is not possible with Manticore, Minelab should consider for future flagship models if indeed a long sequence time wise period noise cancel can/ will yield better performance.
Here’s video I did talking about the above.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yiUupQyJqZc
David.